Image 01

TobaccoReviews

Cigarettes Tobacco Reviews and News

Posts Tagged ‘tobacco smoke’

Tobacco Reduction in Province, Government Decision

Tuesday, January 17th, 2012

cheapest president cigarettesThe government of Saskatchewan has reaffirmed its commitment to reducing tobacco use in the province along with helping those trying to quit. The pledge comes during National Non-Smoking Week.

“National Non-Smoking Week provides an opportunity to recognize tobacco reduction efforts undertaken by the Ministry of Health and provincial tobacco reduction stakeholders,” stated Health Minister Don McMorris.

“We have introduced important legislation to reduce smoking cheapest President cigarettes and the harmful effects of environmental tobacco smoke, and we continue to support cessation.”

One piece of legislation makes it illegal to smoke in a vehicle with children under the age of 16. Smoking is also banned on school grounds in the province.

The government also added two smoking cessation prescription drugs – Champix and Zyban – to the provincial drug plan last year.

An estimated 720 people in Saskatchewan die each year from lung diseases caused by smoking.

36th Great American Smokeout is Nov. 17

Friday, November 11th, 2011

golden gate cigarettesIt does not seem that long ago patrons in restaurants had to smell acrid tobacco smoke while waiting for or eating their meals, employees in shared workspaces endured air clouded with second-hand smoke, and airline passengers had no choice but to breathe clouds of smoke as others lit up cigarettes in the next row.

This casual acceptance of smoking was typical when the American Cancer Society‘s Great American Smokeout went nationwide more than 25 years ago in November 1977. That quarter century has marked dramatic changes in the way society views tobacco promotion and tobacco use. Many public places and work areas are now smoke-free which protects non-smokers and supports smokers who want to quit.

The Great American Smokeout helped to spotlight the dangers of tobacco use and the challenges of quitting, but more importantly it has set the stage for the cultural revolution in tobacco control that has occurred.

Due to the efforts of the American Cancer Society, individuals, healthcare providers and other groups that have led anti-tobacco efforts, there have been significant landmarks in the areas of research, policy, and the environment.

The American Cancer Association estimates 46 million adults in the United States currently smoke, and approximately half will die prematurely from smoking. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death for men and women and more than 80 percent of lung cancers are thought to result from smoking. Smoking causes nearly one in five deaths from all causes.

Passive Smoking Hurts Kids

Friday, October 28th, 2011

buy esse cigarettes onlineChildren exposed to passive smoking are at risk of developing hearing deficiencies during their adolescence. Hearing deficiencies among adolescents occur mostly in the low frequencies.

The reason for this surprising discovery lies in the repeated ear infections caused by tobacco smoke during the early years of life.

Researchers in New York monitored adolescents between the ages of 12 and 19, all of whom answered a series of questions relating to their state of health and family history.

They also underwent hearing tests and a number of blood tests to determine their level of cotinine, a metabolite of nicotine.

The purpose of these blood tests was to determine their degree of exposure to tobacco. The results, which seem unambiguous, reveal that the higher their cotinine level, the greater the level of hearing loss.

Passive smoking increases the risk of repeated ear infections during early childhood, ear infections can cause damage to the ear drum and thus lead to hearing deficiency.

Passive smoking can also affect hearing development in the very young.

Tobacco Smoke at Home Bad for Kids

Tuesday, September 13th, 2011

discount r1 slim cigarettesA new study has concluded that children exposed to tobacco smoke at home miss more time in school than those who live in smoke-free environments. The study was conducted by researchers at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) who determined that R1 Slim cigarettes smoke exposed children suffer from higher rates of respiratory illnesses.

The MGH team also detailed the possible economic cost of the children’s elevated school absences; it’s all been released in the online edition of the journal Pediatrics.

“Among children ages 6 to 11 who live with smokers, one quarter to one third of school absences are due to household smoking,” says Douglas Levy, PhD, of the Mongan Institute for Health Policy at MGH, the paper’s lead author. “On a national basis these absences result in $227 million in lost wages and time for caregivers or their employers.”

The authors point out that one-third of U.S. children live with a smoker, and over half of those aged 3 to 11 have measurable levels of a blood marker for tobacco exposure.

Second hand smoke has been proven to increase cases of ear infections and many respiratory conditions, and missing school is an easy way to measure illness in children.

Previous studies tended to ignore the link between secondhand smoke and children who miss school. However, the MGH group analyzed data from the 2005 National Health Interview Study, which is a yearly in-person survey of representative households across the nation.

Adults that had homes with schoolchildren ages 6 to 11 were asked to judge each child’s overall health and were given the following questions:

• How many people smoked inside the home.

• How many school days the child missed due to illness or injury during the previous year.

• Whether the child had three or more ear infections during the previous year.

• Whether the child had a chest cold or gastrointestinal illness during the preceding two weeks.

• Whether the child had been disgnosed with asthma, and if so, whether the child had any recent asthma attacks.

Among the 3,087 children whose information was reviewed for this study, over 14 percent lived in a home with at least one individual who smoked in the house. Eight percent lived with one smoker and six percent lived with two or more. The study represents 2.6 million children across the nation.

Kids who lived with one smoker had an average of 1.06 more missed days, and those living with two or more had 1.54 more days missing than children living in houses where no one smokes indoors.

Ailments linked with exposure to tobacco smoke, like ear infections and chest colds, made up 24 percent of absences in kids living in homes where one person smoked indoors and 34 percent for the ones living in places with at least two in-home smokers. Interestingly enough, smoking in the home did not lead to more gastrointestinal illness, and while there was no clear association with an asthma diagnosis or asthma attacks, the study sample might have not had included enough children with the ailment to represent smoke exposure’s known role as a trigger for asthma.

The researchers also determined the potential costs associated with missing school due to smoke related illnesses, including lost income for parents without paid time off, the costs to employers, and the inability of caregivers to complete normal household chores.

“The total impact nationwide was $227 million in lost wages and household work for the families of the 2.6 million children living with smokers and for their employers. Since almost half of the smoking households in our study had low incomes, that impact may be strongest on households least able to afford it,” Levy explains.

“The health impact of living with a smoker is probably more extensive than our study shows, since the survey only asked about three conditions associated with smoke exposure and we know there are several more. And since the absentee levels we report are averages, there are probably are kids who miss much more school because they live with smokers than our study found. More research is needed to help understand the long-term health, developmental and economic consequence of growing up in a home where people smoke.”

Smoking Can Cheapen House Prices

Monday, September 5th, 2011

buy hilton cigarettes onlineThe survey says a quarter of buyers would expect a discount on a property if there was evidence a smoker lived there. The news is even worse for those who rent, with 60 per cent of landlords saying they would not even consider letting their properties to a Hilton smoker.

Half of landlords said they would consider increasing the rent for a smoker and a third have held back deposits to cover cleaning and repair costs after damage from tobacco smoke.

Jennifer Warner, from property search engine, which did the research, said the results highlighted a growing anti-smoking culture.

‘It is no surprise that in today’s ultracompetitive rental market, landlords are penalising (smokers) with higher rental charges and, in many cases, refusing to let properties to smokers at all,’ she said.

Economic Influence of Smoking Ban

Wednesday, August 17th, 2011

buy red & white cigarettesIt was a pleasure meeting over a hundred of you in the year 2007 when I was conducting my research on your workers’ exposure to pollution caused by secondhand tobacco smoke and your perception on smoking Red & White cigarettes in public places. I also will forever be indebted to you for providing me momentary utopia anytime I visit your establishment on leisure. I must admit life without your establishment and employees would be less worthy.

As the calendar gradually moves towards the debate on the tobacco bill in Parliament, the tobacco industry and their advocates as expected have started their usual clandestine activities trying to illegitimately convince you that studies have also been published purporting to prove that smoking bans in public places are bad for business. The fact of the matter is we can list numerous studies that prove that smoking bans have no effects on economic gains or losses. We can also find numerous studies that prove that smoking is good for business and studies that prove otherwise. I would like to emphasize that, irrespective of the study findings; they all believe ban of smoking in public places prevents diseases. Also, one common issue with these studies is that, for most part they tend to measure profit as in net cash benefits externalizing the disease cost of the workers and patrons, and the soft benefits such as worker health, punctuality and worker retention.
Now, allow me to draw some differences between the studies that purports smoking ban improves or is benign to business and studies that purport that smoking ban hurts business.

Firstly, most of the publishers of studies that find smoking ban hurting business are sponsored by the tobacco companies whose main interest is to maximize profit through tobacco sales whiles most of the studies that prove otherwise are sponsored by non-profit public health promotion organizations whose main interest is to prevent diseases and promote health. I find therefore, the objectivity of studies that reports smoking ban, hurts the economy questionable since their sponsor’s main objective is to maximize financial profit through the sales of cigarettes. I also think non-profit public health funded study has a lesser propensity to be biased since the research results neither do not lead to financial gain nor losses to their organization.

Secondly, most studies that reported loss in revenue due to smoking ban in public places were conducted in places with high smoking prevalence. Additionally, the smokers had an option to travel within a short distance to another smoking permitted bar, restaurant or nightclub. I want to assure you that the scope of enforcement of this tobacco bill would be national such that no public place would allow smoking hence preventing the advantage of establishments that would allow smoking. Also most people that like to hang-out at public places such as the nightclubs and bars are non-smokers and we should not forget that we are losing lots of revenue because a significant number of non-smokers and their families would rather stay home than to be exposed to the perils of tobacco smoke.

Thirdly, my dear hardworking owners of public places, let us ask ourselves that, why is smoking banned in all banks, hospitals, government agencies, in the planes and most ‘decent’ and ‘professional’ enterprises but not our noble small scale enterprises and places of employment? Presently in Ghana, no one can smoke in anyone’s workplace – unless of course your workplace happens to be a bar or nightclub! The irony is, research has shown that bars and nightclub workers are exposed to greater levels of tobacco smoke than any other occupational group. Is it because patrons and lawmakers do not regard your enterprises or your jobs? I am sure, based on my interview with you in 2007 that 80% of you are allowing this to go on because of the erroneous impression that banning smoking in your enterprise would lead to loss of revenue – you may be right to some extent especially if the ban is not nationwide and not properly enforced. Now that we know an objective and convincing international body of evidence show the positive or benign association between financial gain and smoking ban, I think you the owners of smoking public places should actually lead the advocacy and enforcement of this life saving bill.

Fourthly, most of the members of your association support a proposed ban of smoke in public places, I am therefore appealing to you to make a public statement on your position on this matter. After all it is only patriotic to join in national debates.

Lastly, I would take this opportunity to remind you about the clear linkage between smoking and secondhand tobacco smoke and the rising incidence of cancers, heart attacks and stroke among our population. The good news is, in other countries smoking bans have been able to reduce smoking related disease incidence significantly. We should also not forget that smoking imposes considerable direct and indirect cost on increase in healthcare cost, absenteeism, and higher employee turnover rate.

Up in Tobacco Smoke

Tuesday, June 7th, 2011

cheap esse cigarettes onlineThe supermarket ran out of my brand of Esse cigarette the other week and goodness, what a silly business it was to find an alternative. Thanks to the new laws regarding the selling of tobacco, it was quite the performance. You may know that cigarettes now have to be hidden, but did you also know that price tickets are considered as advertising and are therefore banned as well?

And you can’t ask an open-ended question like, “What’s the cheapest brand?” because by law the shop assistants aren’t allowed to answer. They can only respond to specific questions about specific brands. So I had to rack my memory to find an alternative.

In the past I could have just asked for the next strongest or weakest option of my brand but someone evidently decided that labelling cigarettes with different levels of nicotine (eg 4mg, 8mg, 12mg) might give people the horrifying idea that some cigarettes were less harmful than others. So they got rid of that and now they all haves names like Smooth, Rich or Fine, which mean absolutely nothing. Though frankly, if you couldn’t tell the difference between a 16mg cigarette and a 2mg cigarette you should probably check and see if your brain has accidentally fallen out of your skull.

In the past you could also usually judge a cigarette’s strength by the colour of the packet; the stronger the cigarette the darker the colour but guess what, they changed all the colours as well. So I now find myself in the utterly stupid situation of having no information at all regarding strength or price when I’m choosing my cigarettes. It’s a stab in the dark. I understand the shop can display a price board but only if it’s covered in those grotesque anti-smoking ads and my supermarket hasn’t got around to that yet, so every week I have absolutely no idea as to what I’ll actually be paying.

Bear in mind with all of this that tobacco is a legal product. It is not a criminal offence to buy, sell or use the stuff and there is little chance that it will be banned completely. If it was outlawed, an instant black market would spring up, and with the tax component of the cigarette price being roughly 70%, the Government would lose millions of dollars in revenue. So it’s not a crime to smoke. But it’s sure beginning to feel like it.

The Government has justified all this on the grounds that these are health measures and it’s all for our own good. Give me a break. It’s revenue raising. If health concerns were really driving this, it would be a part of a whole suite of measures that would greatly increase the taxes on alcohol, fast food and sugary drinks. Gee, I wonder why they’re not doing that? Oh that’s right, a lot of people would get very angry at the Government. They might even lose votes. Much easier to overcharge and beat up on a despised minority, and let the majority of the population feel all smug and self-righteous.

Some of you may be wondering how I can possibly defend such a disgusting habit and why I’m not fighting hard to beat my terrible addiction. I must be a) really stupid or b) a weak-willed wuss. So let me tell you how I became happily addicted to nicotine. And no, it wasn’t because an evil tobacco executive held a gun to my head. When I was 21 I finally told my mother that I had been sexually abused by my step-father. All hell broke loose and various people were called in to discuss the situation. It was decided that I would go and stay with friends while my mother confronted my step-father.

That was the most tense and anxious weekend of my life. I didn’t know if he would attack my mother or come looking for me or what. I was so tense that you could have bounced a coin off any part of my body. My friends decided that I desperately needed to relax and were going to give me a joint, but before introducing me to pot, they decided to teach me how to draw back on a cigarette first.

When the nicotine hit I got head spins up the wazoo and literally fell back on the floor as every muscle suddenly relaxed. That’s when I fell deeply and irrevocably in love with tobacco. It may be bad for my physical health but it’s good for my mental health. It suits my brain chemistry. It’s one of the many drugs that I use to self-medicate and deal with my Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. So get off my back all you do-gooders.

There is bigger question here as well. The place of minority rights within a democracy. Democracy is not purely about doing whatever the majority thinks, it’s a balancing act between majority beliefs and the right of minorities to exist. As a member of a few despised minorities (smoker, lesbian, fat person) I hope you never have to experience the socially-sanctioned scorn and abuse I have received over the years.

If democracy was a pure numbers game, we’d be ruled by opinion polls and progressive legislation would never get passed. If the lowest common denominator was the be all and end all of politics, if brave politicians never introduced a necessary but unpopular policy, we’d probably still have the death penalty, it would still be illegal to be gay and in all likelihood the White Australia policy would still be in place. Minority rights matter.

You might not like smoking, but you should be worried about how this government is treating us. If they feel safe trampling on the rights of 20 per cent of the population, anyone who’s a member of a smaller group should be getting very nervous right about now.