Image 01

TobaccoReviews

Cigarettes Tobacco Reviews and News

Posts Tagged ‘tobacco industry’

New Tobacco Product in Kansas

Friday, May 27th, 2011

best marlboro cigarettes onlineTuesday, May 31 is World No Tobacco Day, a day to consider the dangers of tobacco products and an opportunity to share with Kansans that the tobacco industry has introduced a new cigarette product that comes with some of the same health risks as other tobacco products. The Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE) wants Kansans to know that the state is currently a test market for tobacco sticks and the potential dangers of this new product.

The tobacco sticks, sold under the popular Skoal, are sold in matchbook-size packages and look like chocolate-covered toothpicks. According to one tester, the products not only look like candy, they also taste like candy. The tobacco sticks have been seen at convenience stores across the state. Kansas is one of only three states where tobacco sticks are currently being test marketed.

“As the state’s health agency, KDHE is particularly concerned about the potential appeal of these new tobacco sticks to youth,” KDHE Secretary Dr. Robert Moser said. “The packages are so small that they could easily be concealed in a shirt or pants pocket and youth could use tobacco sticks in front of parents or teachers while appearing to have a simple toothpick in their mouth. We are also concerned about the risk of young children accidentally ingesting these products.”

The possibility that adults will carry the small packages in their pockets or leave them in other unsecured places means that young children may have easy access to tobacco sticks. As with any tobacco product, there is a risk that a young child may ingest a lethal amount of nicotine. The estimated minimal lethal pediatric dose is 1 mg of nicotine per 2.2 pounds of body weight. Ingestion of as little as 1 mg of nicotine by a small child can produce symptoms such as nausea and vomiting. While the nicotine content of Marlboro and Skoal tobacco sticks has not been tested, a study in Pediatrics found that a similar product Camel Sticks had 3.1 mg of nicotine per stick.

Each year the World Health Organization (WHO) celebrates World No Tobacco Day, highlighting the health risks associated with tobacco use and advocating for effective policies to reduce consumption. According to WHO, tobacco use is the second cause of death globally (after hypertension) and is currently responsible for killing one in 10 adults worldwide.

When Kansans are ready to quit tobacco use, the Kansas Tobacco will provide support and work with the caller to develop a plan to quit. Counselors will provide information and guidance during one-on-one telephone sessions. Kansans can call the Quitline anytime day or night to start the process. Once enrolled in the free service, callers will work with a counselor who will set up sessions that fit the caller’s schedule.

During these sessions, callers will discuss the reasons they want to quit and find ways to handle any barriers. Studies have found that using a tobacco Quitline can more than double a person’s chances of successfully quitting tobacco.

Plain Cigarette Packaging, New Proposal

Monday, May 16th, 2011

cheap red & white cigarettesThe federal government has clarified the colour of its proposed plain packaging for Red & White cigarettes – at the request of olive growers. “I need to publicly say to the olive growers that we don’t think that their products are in any way connected with the very unattractive product of tobacco,” federal Health Minister Nicola Roxon told reporters in western Sydney today.

“Even though the colour we are using is olive green … I am now calling it drab green.”

When the legislation was announced earlier this year, the government said the plain packaging would be olive green, but olive growers objected.

The colour rumpus is just one of the issues the government will be taking into consideration before enforcing plain packaging for tobacco products later this year.

“There is lots of things in the legislation that people have views about … but ultimately the fight we face with the tobacco industry is they don’t want to see this measure be successful,” she said.

“There is fundamentally no good news from the tobacco industry. They sell a product that kills people … we want to make sure that the tobacco industry can’t use a package to try to attract new smokers to their product.”

British American Tobacco Australia is expected tomorrow to launch a national media campaign against the federal government’s plain packaging proposal.

Smokers May Sue Cigarette Makers

Friday, May 6th, 2011

best lucky strike cigarettes onlineThe California Supreme Court decided unanimously Thursday that smokers may sue cigarette makers once they develop a disease such as lung cancer, even if they suffered different smoking-related ailments years earlier.

The decision is likely to keep alive lawsuits that might have otherwise been thrown out because of expired legal deadlines, and to permit new suits to be filed.

In the case before the court, a former smoker was diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in 1989 and a couple of years later with periodontal disease, both attributable to smoking Lucky Strike or other brands. But she did not sue the tobacco industry until she was diagnosed with lung cancer in 2003.

Cigarette makers argued that her suit should be dismissed because the timetable for suing began when she first discovered that smoking had injured her in 1989.

The state high court, in a ruling written by Justice Joyce L. Kennard, concluded that an earlier disease does not trigger the legal deadline for filing suit if the injury was “separate and distinct” from the later ailment.

“We hold that two physical injuries — both caused by the same tobacco use over the same period of time — can, in some circumstances, be considered ‘qualitatively different’” for determining when the clock begins ticking on legal deadlines, Kennard wrote.

“Although we are disappointed with the decision, the California Supreme Court made it clear that it was not addressing the merits of this case or any case,” the statement said. “Rather, the decision addresses a narrow technical point of law relating to the statute of limitations. The decision would be relevant only in a very small fraction of cases filed.”

Lloyd LeRoy, an attorney for the former smoker, called the ruling “extremely significant, particularly for tobacco litigation in California.”

Until Thursday’s ruling, smokers could not sue after getting lung cancer if their medical records showed that they were diagnosed with smoker’s cough or another smoking-related ailment years earlier, LeeRoy said. State legal deadlines give people two years to sue after discovering an injury.

“What this says is the courtroom door is open again,” LeeRoy said.

The smoker’s lawsuit is before the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, which asked the state high court to clarify how legal deadlines should apply under California law.