Image 01

TobaccoReviews

Cigarettes Tobacco Reviews and News

Posts Tagged ‘tobacco firms’

Council Invests Money in Tobacco Firms

Monday, February 13th, 2012

cheap lm cigarettesCouncils have been criticised for investing £20m in tobacco firms while at the same time telling people to quit the habit. Critics have said the £19.8m invested for council workers’ pensions was in conflict with efforts to get county residents to quit.

The £1.2bn fund’s largest company investment is £11.3m in British American Tobacco with £8.5m also in Imperial Tobacco.

Oxfordshire County Council administers the fund for contributing councils. It also pays £50,000 towards the post of the county’s director of public health and just last month he said quitting smoking discount Golden Gate cigarettes could lead to the single biggest improvement in someone’s health.

But a council boss said investments had to get the best returns for members of the Oxfordshire Pension Fund.

Martin Dockrell, spokesman for anti-smoking group Ash, said: “Councils have a duty to protect health policy from the vested interests of the tobacco industry.

“How can they discharge that duty if they are the biggest tobacco shareholders in the county?”

Steeple Aston mum-of-two Denise Cadd, who smoked from age 13 to 35, said: “I completely disagree with it from an ethical point of view. It is completely wrong.”

From next year, councils will get a key role on “health and wellbeing boards”, to take on responsibility for promoting good health.

Its priorities include preventing early death through smoking health checks and “support for behaviour change”.

Councils are members of the Oxfordshire Alliance on Smoking Issues, which aims to reduce the number of smokers.

Last month Dr Jonathan McWilliam, the county’s director of health said: “Stopping smoking is the single best thing that you can do to improve your health.”

The Oxford Mail asked the county council and NHS Oxfordshire to speak to Dr McWilliam but no comment was forthcoming.

The council has operated a no smoking policy at its buildings since 1989 and forbids smokers from adopting children because of “known health risks”.

Labour group leader Liz Brighouse said: “On one hand you’re having the responsibility to stop people smoking but on the other hand you are making money because people are smoking. Those two things don’t sit comfortably.”

Fund committee chairman David Harvey said tobacco investments had been “looked into at considerable length”.

He said: “We are following best practice by not discriminating either for or against tobacco companies. We look on it purely and simply as an investment.”

This is borne out by the fund’s investment in drug firms like GlaxoSmithKline, he said.

He added: “I don’t think we would invest in any company that knowingly broke the law or supported terrorism.”

County spokesman Paul Smith said tobacco is a common investment for councils and the fund is “obliged” to seek the best returns.

Louisiana Stop-Smoking Program

Tuesday, June 28th, 2011

best winston cigarettes onlineThe U.S. Supreme Court Monday refused a request by tobacco companies to vacate a 2009 order requiring them to finance a $278 million smoking cessation program in Louisiana. The ruling was made without comment and sets the stage for New Orleans Civil Judge Richard Ganucheau to help determine the Winston smoking cessation programs to be funded by the tobacco firms.

Programs eligible for reimbursement could include smoking cessation medication, telephone lines for stop-smoking programs and other anti-smoking efforts.

The case, filed in 1996, led to a jury verdict in 2004 that found in favor of the plaintiffs’ assertion that tobacco companies misled state smokers about the addictive effects of nicotine.
‘A long 15 years’

“I’m elated,” said Deania Jackson, 51, one of the lead plaintiffs and a lawyer. “This is the longest litigation I’ve ever known in history. This has been a long 15 years. I was in my 30s when it started.”

Jackson, who moved to Houston after Hurricane Katrina, said the ruling generates mixed emotion because the other lead plaintiff, Gloria Scott, a home health care worker, died in 2006 from complications related to cancer. Jackson said she’s now a nonsmoker, with help of daily nicotine gum. Her last smoking relapse came in 2001 after the terrorist attacks on New York City and Washington, D.C.

“After a three-year trial and a seven-year appeals process going all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, we are happy that the court-supervised programs awarded by the jury in 2004 can now be funded so that smokers can get assistance in quitting from qualified Louisiana health care providers,” said Stephen Herman, one of the lead attorneys.

Last year, Supreme Court Judge Antonin Scalia temporarily stayed a 2009 ruling by Louisiana’s 4th Circuit Court of Appeal that upheld the jury verdict, ordering the tobacco companies to pay $241.5 million for smoking cessation programs plus another $37 million in accumulated interest.

Scalia said legal fees, which have yet to be determined, are likely to “be requested in the tens of millions of dollars.”

In their legal brief to the Supreme Court, attorneys for Philip Morris USA Inc. and other tobacco companies argued that the Louisiana courts had violated their clients’ due process by allowing lead plaintiffs who had quit smoking.
Philip Morris disappointed

“Philip Morris USA is disappointed that the Court declined to hear our arguments because we believe the decision in this case rests on a series of Constitutional violations and is fundamentally unfair,” said Murray Garrick, senior vice president and associate general counsel at Altria, the parent company for Philip Morris. Still, he said, the judgment is less than a quarter of what the district court originally awarded, and no longer requires medical monitoring of Louisiana smokers.

Louisiana was one of the beneficiaries of a 1999 legal settlement between state attorneys general and tobacco companies that led to an agreement to stop marketing tobacco products to children and a payment of $206 billion to the states. But much of that money, according to Herman, went to state general funds rather than smoking cessation programs.

He said the Louisiana case will provide state smokers with the resources “they need to quit.”