Image 01

TobaccoReviews

Cigarettes Tobacco Reviews and News

Archive for the ‘Anti-Tobacco Laws’ Category

New York City Plans to Keep Tobacco Products Out of Sight

Monday, May 20th, 2013

New York City Enter any retail outlet or gas station in the country, and probabilities are the cigarettes will be in approximately the same place: at eye level, directly behind the cash register.

That is no coincidence. Cigarette manufacturers have worked tough, and paid enough, to make sure that cigarette displays take up the best spot. For instance in 2010 solely, the tobacco industry spend $370 million in payments to merchants to help secure the prime shelving area, in accordance to a survey presented by the Federal Trade Commission. It has also spent an extra $107 million on in-store marketing. “Every consumer product goods producer in the country would like to be there,” stated Kurt M. Ribisl, a lecturer at the University of North Carolina who analyses tobacco marketing. “Companies producing chips and Pepsi, all of them want that best space. But the tobacco industry is the winner.” Currently, that supremacy could be at risk in one of the country’s largest cigarette markets.

New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg suggested a bill recently that would induce retailers to retain cigarettes out of sight until a customer asks for a package. The given law would efficiently demand retailers to hold smoking products in closed cupboards or boxes, rather than on the vibrant displays, called “power walls,” that are recognizable nearly almost everywhere in the US. A second bill would monitor the process of discounts and offers that producers have used to seek after customers and always keep retailers satisfied. It would suspend discount coupons and any of buy-one-get-one-free special offers for smoking products and get rid of strong discounts by assuring a price floor for each package. It is too earlier to ascertain whether or not one of these measures will come through the legislative procedure. Cigarette manufacturers and convenience store proprietors have attacked both suggestions claiming that they are unfair and perhaps unconstitutional. An industry legal action pushed the New York village of Haverstraw to rapidly cancel an identical ban passed last April. It is more uncertain is whether the policy would really end up in fewer people lighting up.

Many nations, such as Ireland, Canada and Australia, have restrained retail tobacco displays, however most specialists state that the guidelines haven’t been ready long enough to understand whether they have had a solid effect. Opponents of the law state it will only bother smokers unnecessarily and make things more complicated for small scale businesses.

Cigarette Packs New Legislation Soon, the UAE Ministry of Health

Friday, November 9th, 2012

cheap ok cigsThe UAE Ministry of Health is likely to introduce new anti-tobacco ordinances with a view to discourage inhabitants from smoking tobacco products. The third clause of the federal Tobacco Control Law No.25 of 2009 relates to the statutory warnings on OK cigarette packets. The new laws are likely to make it compulsory to cover half of the surface place of the cigarette packages with health risk smoking warnings including pictures of a snake, a pregnant woman and a diseased hand holding a burning cig.

Cigarettes companies are likely to be given a three-month deadline to exhaust their old stock of cigs and introduce packages with the new health smoking warnings and images.

These regulations are likely to be adopted by other GCC states which will not allow import of smoking products without the new health warning images after three months.

According to Abu Dhabi health statistics for 2011, 24 per cent UAE national men and 29 percent of expatriate men smoked. In the case of women, only 0.08 percent of nationals smoked tobacco against 6.6 percent for emigrants.

Tobacco Use Banned On Northampton County

Wednesday, November 7th, 2012

cheap camel cigaretteOn Monday, following a public hearing to take new comments, the Northampton County Board of Commissioners voted unanimously to approve a law that bans smoking cigarettes and the use of other smoking products in county buildings, vehicles and grounds. County Manager Wayne Jenkins said in February the Board of Health adopted a decision recommending the Board of Commissioners adopt a law to ban smoking and use of other tobacco products on county properties. “This is not precedence setting because the Cultural and Wellness Center is smoke-free,” Jenkins declared to the board.

The regulation states that smoking tobacco and the use of smoking products are banned in any building owned, leased or occupied by the county, in any county vehicle owned, leased or controlled by the county and on any grounds that are owned, leased or occupied by the county.

Smoking and the use of tobacco products are also prohibited in county buildings and on county grounds being used for private events.

The county will place signs indicating the tobacco-free places and remove all ashtrays and receptacles.

The law does provide enforcement and penalty in which following an oral or written notice failure to quit smoking or using tobacco products may constitute an infraction punishable by a fine of not more than $50. A fact may be issued by a sworn law enforcement officer.

County employees may be subject to disciplinary action according to county policies.

“If you approve this regulation today it becomes effective 60 days from the date of approval,” Jenkins argued. “The main aim of this regulation is for educational purposes and that is to educate our citizens and to remind our inhabitants about the use of tobacco products, and the issues and concerns that come as the result of the use of tobacco. We have in place a legislation out at the Cultural and Wellness Center, no one has been arrested, no one has been issued a citation—its only there for education and our staff reminds our residents time to time that this is a smoke-free campus.”

He added the same reason and logic used at the Cultural and Wellness Center will be applied with the county law. Commissioner Chester Deloatch questioned what would happen to employees that smoke tobacco on county property.

Smoking Signs, Confused Bus Passengers, Calgary News

Tuesday, November 6th, 2012

best hilton cigaretteSmoking tobacco is prohibited on Calgary Transit station, but some new signs have caused confusion for bus  passengers. New containers for disposing of cigarettes butts have gone up at bus zones near several C-Train stations. The new intention is to reduce the disorders associated with cigs. But the cigarette labels on the containers indicate a special smoking zone, which encourages passage users to gather around them and smoke tobacco, declared Ald. Diane Colley-Urquhart.

Mac Logan, the general manager of transportation, argued that despite the signs, smoking cigarette is not permitted on transit place.

“We need to sort of elucidate the signs. It seems to be indicating that it’s okay to smoke tobacco there,” he explained. “I understand the complaints so we’re going to go out and have a look at it.”

Cigarettes Plain Packages Ordinance, Big Tobacco

Thursday, August 23rd, 2012

cheap dunhill cigaretteBig Tobacco, as the industry is coming to be called even by objective reporters, is unlikely to find much sympathy in its fight against the latest danger to its business plain packages. Most people maybe wonder why it matters if cigarette makers are no longer permitted to put their brands conspicuous on the packs. Few estimate how much any tobacco consumer depends on its smoking brand, and how much producers invest in establishing and maintaining the brand name. “Intellectual property” might be a grandiose name for commercial smoking branding but it is most sure property and governments are guilty of confiscating it if they legislate to prevent its use.

The New Zealand Government is thinking over ordinance, “subject to consultation”. That is maybe an invitation to industry lobbyists for to continue talking to ministers while the Government waits to see if alike law in Australia happens.

The Gillard Government’s plain-pack law, to come into force in December, has just endured a challenge by four tobacco companies who claimed the legislation breached Australia’s constitution. The High Court ruled it did not. But that is just the first of three legal tests the ordinance faces.

The second is a case before the World Trade Organisation brought by Governments of a number of tobacco-manufacturing countries with the support of brand-owning companies. They claim plain cigarettes pack is a technical barrier to tobacco trade. The third action, brought by one cigarette company, Philip Morris, challenges the legislation under the terms of an Australian trade contract with Hong Kong.

As long as the Australian regulation does not discriminate between smoking products of any country it should satisfy WTO rules and free-trade acts. The fears that these sorts of actions threaten a nation’s position and democracy are promoted mainly by those opposed to free trade in principle, not tobacco product in particular.

No-Smoking Law Gaps in Pennsylvania

Friday, July 27th, 2012

cheapest ok cigarettesPennsylvania’s no-smoking regulation has too many gaps that should be eliminated for to protect more workers from the passive smoking, leaders of anti-tobacco groups told state lawmakers at a hearing in Pittsburgh Thursday. Members of the House Democratic Policy Committee were urged to remove the exemptions in the almost 4-year-old law that permit clients and employees in many workplaces,  including casinos, bars and even private clubs, for to continue to smoke their cigarettes.

“While Pennsylvania has a clean indoor air legislation, it is not complete and fails to fully protect all its inhabitants equally under the law,” Cindy Thomas, executive director of Tobacco Free Allegheny, declared.

Under the state’s Clean Indoor Air Act, which took effect in September 2008 after more than a decade of legislative wrangling, bars can apply for an exemption if they don’t permit anyone under 18 inside and if food accounts for 20 per cent or less of total tobacco sales. At the state’s 11 casinos, half the gaming floor is exempt. There is no doubt that the “witches brew” of chemicals in cigarettes smoke causes cancer, heart disease and other ailments, explained Diane Phillips, government relations official with the American Cancer Society.

“Because there is no secure level of exposure to secondhand smoke, it’s time to leave these exemptions and protect inhabitants rather than protecting cigarettes consumption,” she argued.

The hearing at the University of Pittsburgh’s O’Hara Student Center in Oakland was requested by Rep. Dan Frankel, D-Squirrel Hill, prompted in part, he reported, by a story in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette in April that appeared questions about how well the smoking ban was being implemented. Mr. Frankel told that he hoped the hearing was the first of many intended to spur changes in the legislation.

Grand Forks Prohibited Smoking Tobacco

Thursday, May 31st, 2012

discount winston cigaretteA study conducted one year after Grand Forks prohibited smoking tobacco in bars and other public places shows 84 per cent of respondents support the new legislation. “It’s grown to be one of the most agreement-building regulations,” declared Cordell Fontaine, director of the Social Science Research Institute at UND, which conducted the survey of 691 adults in November and December 2011.

The survey results show big support since the new ban was enforced in August 2010, he argued. “It’s essentially a repetition of the investigation we’d done in 2010.”

Majority of those investigated also declared that they believed that secondhand smoke is harmful for people’s health and smoking should not be permitted in workplaces. They also reported that they supported bars more now than they did before the city banned cigarettes smoking in bars.

The study was commissioned by the Grand Forks Tobacco Free Union, which pushed the city to prohibit smoking in all public areas in Grand Forks. The $29,000 cost was paid for by the state Center for Tobacco Prevention and Smoking Control Policy, which administers parts of the settlement the state made with Big Tobacco.